Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Navigating the New Landscape: A Conceptual Model for Project-Based Assessment (PBA) in the Age of GenAI

Authors
Rajan Kadel,
Samar Shailendra,
Urvashi Rahul Saxena
Date
Publisher
arXiv
The rapid integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into higher education presents both opportunities and challenges for assessment design, particularly within Project-Based Assessment (PBA) contexts. Traditional assessment methods often emphasise the final product in the PBA, which can now be significantly influenced or created by GenAI tools, raising concerns regarding product authenticity, academic integrity, and learning validation. This paper advocates for a reimagined assessment model for Project-Based Learning (PBL) or a capstone project that prioritises process-oriented evaluation, multi-modal and multifaceted assessment design, and ethical engagement with GenAI to enable higher-order thinking. The model also emphasises the use of (GenAI-assisted) personalised feedback by a supervisor as an observance of the learning process during the project lifecycle. A use case scenario is provided to illustrate the application of the model in a capstone project setting. The paper concludes with recommendations for educators and curriculum designers to ensure that assessment practices remain robust, learner-centric, and integrity-driven in the evolving landscape of GenAI.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How can project-based assessments be redesigned to evaluate student learning authentically and ethically with generative AI?
  • Setting and data: Higher education capstone project use case scenario
  • Method: Conceptual model development illustrated with an example use case scenario
Why it matters

Traditional project-based assessments often emphasize final products that generative AI can now influence or create. This shift raises concerns about product authenticity, academic integrity, and learning validation.

Key findings
  • In higher education project-based assessments, evaluating the learning process, multifaceted designs, and ethical AI engagement enables higher-order thinking and authenticates learning.
  • Traditional project-based assessments focusing on final products face integrity risks because generative AI tools can significantly shape or create those products.
  • AI-assisted personalized feedback allows supervisors to observe and track student learning processes across the entire project lifecycle.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

Who is the user?
Who age?