Date
Publisher
arXiv
Natural language-based assessment (NLA) is an approach to second language
assessment that uses instructions - expressed in the form of can-do descriptors
- originally intended for human examiners, aiming to determine whether large
language models (LLMs) can interpret and apply them in ways comparable to human
assessment. In this work, we explore the use of such descriptors with an
open-source LLM, Qwen 2.5 72B, to assess responses from the publicly available
S&I Corpus in a zero-shot setting. Our results show that this approach -
relying solely on textual information - achieves competitive performance: while
it does not outperform state-of-the-art speech LLMs fine-tuned for the task, it
surpasses a BERT-based model trained specifically for this purpose. NLA proves
particularly effective in mismatched task settings, is generalisable to other
data types and languages, and offers greater interpretability, as it is
grounded in clearly explainable, widely applicable language descriptors.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can artificial intelligence evaluate second-language speaking ability using scoring guidelines written for human examiners?
- Setting and data: Responses from the publicly available S&I Corpus.
- Method: Tests an open-source AI model using human scoring rubrics to evaluate language responses (zero-shot setting).
Why it matters
Second language assessment seeks to determine whether large language models can interpret and apply instructions—expressed as can-do descriptors originally intended for human examiners—in ways comparable to human assessment.
Key findings
- An AI evaluating second-language speech transcripts using human grading rubrics achieved competitive accuracy, outperforming an earlier specialized text model but trailing specialized speech models.
- Assessing second-language responses with human grading descriptors proved particularly effective for unfamiliar test tasks and generalized across different languages and data types.
- Grounding AI grading in standard, human-designed language rubrics provided clearer and more explainable assessment results.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
