Date
Publisher
arXiv
This study investigates the impact of a novel application of generative
artificial intelligence (AI) in physics instruction: engaging students in
prompting, refining, and validating AI-constructed simulations of physical
phenomena. In a second-semester physics course for life science majors, we
conducted a comparative study of three instructional approaches in a laboratory
focused on electric potentials: (i) students using physical equipment, (ii)
students using a prebuilt simulator, and (iii) students using AI to generate a
simulation. We found significant group differences in performance on conceptual
assessments of the laboratory content ({\eta}^2 = 0.359). Post-hoc analysis
showed that students in both the AI-generated and prebuilt simulation
conditions scored significantly higher on the conceptual assessments than
students in the physical equipment condition. Students in these groups also
reported more favorable perceptions of the learning experience. Finally, this
preliminary study highlights opportunities for developing students' modeling
skills through the processes of designing, refining, and validating
AI-generated simulations.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
