Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Leveraging AI Graders for Missing Score Imputation to Achieve Accurate Ability Estimation in Constructed-Response Tests

Authors
Masaki Uto,
Yuma Ito
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Evaluating the abilities of learners is a fundamental objective in the field of education. In particular, there is an increasing need to assess higher-order abilities such as expressive skills and logical thinking. Constructed-response tests such as short-answer and essay-based questions have become widely used as a method to meet this demand. Although these tests are effective, they require substantial manual grading, making them both labor-intensive and costly. Item response theory (IRT) provides a promising solution by enabling the estimation of ability from incomplete score data, where human raters grade only a subset of answers provided by learners across multiple test items. However, the accuracy of ability estimation declines as the proportion of missing scores increases. Although data augmentation techniques for imputing missing scores have been explored in order to address this limitation, they often struggle with inaccuracy for sparse or heterogeneous data. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes a novel method for imputing missing scores by leveraging automated scoring technologies for accurate IRT-based ability estimation. The proposed method achieves high accuracy in ability estimation while markedly reducing manual grading workload.
Study at a glance
  • Question: Can AI graders accurately fill in missing test scores to measure student ability and reduce grading workload?
  • Setting and data: Not stated in the abstract
  • Method: Computational method development using automated scoring to fill in missing test scores
Why it matters

Constructed-response tests evaluate higher-order abilities, but manual grading is labor-intensive and costly. While grading only a subset of answers reduces workload, accuracy declines as missing scores increase, and existing imputation techniques struggle with sparse data.

Key findings
  • In constructed-response tests, using AI graders to fill in missing scores achieved high accuracy in estimating overall learner abilities.
  • Supplementing human raters with automated scoring markedly reduced the manual grading workload needed to evaluate students' short-answer and essay responses.
  • Estimating student ability from partial human grading becomes increasingly inaccurate as the proportion of unscored test items rises.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who age?