Search and Filter

Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

It's Not The Plane - It's The Pilot: A Framework for Cognitive-Activated AI-Augmentation to Avoid the Boiling Frog Problem

Date
Publisher
arXiv
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems can now reliably solve many standard tasks used in introductory physics courses, producing correct equations, graphs, and explanations. While this capability is often framed as an opportunity for efficiency or personalization, it also poses a subtle ethical and educational risk: students may increasingly submit correct results without engaging in the epistemic practices that define learning physics. This challenge has recently been described as the "boiling frog problem" because we may not fully recognize how rapidly AI capabilities are advancing and fail to respond with commensurate urgency. In this article, we argue that the central challenge of AI in physics education is not cheating or tool selection, but instructional design. Drawing on research on self-regulated learning, cognitive load, multiple representations, and hybrid intelligence, we propose a practical framework for cognitively activated learning activities that structures student activities before, during, and after AI use. Using an example from an introductory kinematics laboratory, we show how AI can be integrated in ways that preserve prediction, interpretation, and evaluation as core learning activities. Rather than treating AI as an answer-generating tool, the framework positions AI as an epistemic partner whose contributions are deliberately bounded and reflected upon.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How can instructional tasks structure AI use in physics to preserve and enhance students' essential cognitive work?
  • Setting and data: A downward elevator ride in the Shard, London, measuring vertical smartphone acceleration data.
  • Method: Conceptual framework and instructional design proposal illustrated with a concrete physics classroom example.
Why it matters

Generative AI can solve introductory physics problems easily. Incremental accommodations risk quietly eroding students' engagement in foundational epistemic practices, such as predicting, evaluating evidence, and scientific reasoning.

Key findings
  • Learning science principles suggest that procedural execution can be delegated to AI, but predicting outcomes, evaluating outputs, and diagnosing errors must remain human epistemic tasks.
  • The AIRIS framework structures physics learning into three phases: activating prior knowledge before AI, guided inquiry during AI use, and explicit reflection on cognitive contributions afterward.
  • A concrete kinematics inquiry illustrates how students predict motion curves first, delegate curve derivation to AI, and then evaluate physical consistency, sensor noise, and limitations.

Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?