Date
Publisher
arXiv
Educational recommender systems (ERSs) are becoming increasingly important in enhancing educational outcomes and personalizing learning experiences by providing recommendations of personalized resources and activities to learners, tailored to their individual learning needs. While user control is widely assumed to improve user experience, the effects of different levels of control in ERSs remain underexplored. To address this gap, we designed and evaluated an interactive ERS within the MOOC platform CourseMapper, where learners could interact with the input (i.e., user profile), process (i.e., recommendation algorithm), and output (i.e., recommendations) of the system. We conducted a between-subjects user study (N=184) to examine how varying levels of user control in an ERS influenced users' perceptions of the recommendation goals of perceived control, transparency, trust, satisfaction, and perceived quality. Our results show that enabling users to build and refine their profile is sufficient to promote positive perceptions of the ERS, while additional control options mainly reinforce these impressions. Moreover, perceived control is the only goal significantly affected by providing different levels of user control in the ERS, with input control exerting the strongest influence. Furthermore, different levels of control affect transparency, trust, satisfaction, and perceived quality in distinct yet interconnected ways. Overall, the findings provide empirical evidence that user control positively shapes transparency, trust, satisfaction, and perceived quality, though to varying extents.
Study at a glance
- Question: How do different levels of user control in an educational recommender system influence learner perceptions?
- Setting and data: 184 online participants recruited via Prolific, predominantly residing in the UK and US, interacting with CourseMapper MOOC courses.
- Method: Between-subjects online experiment using mixed methods, including ANOVA, structural equation modeling, and deductive thematic analysis.
Why it matters
Educational recommender systems personalize learning, but the effects of providing different levels of user control over their inputs, processes, and outputs remain underexplored.
Key findings
- Perceived control was the only outcome significantly affected across control levels (p = .033), with input control scoring significantly higher than output control.
- Controlling the user profile alone was sufficient to establish positive perceptions of the system, while additional control mechanisms primarily served to reinforce these views.
- Perceived user control strongly correlated with transparency and satisfaction, operating indirectly through transparency and perceived quality to significantly enhance trust.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
