Date
Publisher
arXiv
Automated Short Answer Scoring (ASAS) is a critical component in educational
assessment. While traditional ASAS systems relied on rule-based algorithms or
complex deep learning methods, recent advancements in Generative Language
Models (GLMs) offer new opportunities for improvement. This study explores the
application of GLMs to ASAS, leveraging their off-the-shelf capabilities and
performance in various domains. We propose a novel pipeline that combines
vector databases, transformer-based encoders, and GLMs to enhance short answer
scoring accuracy. Our approach stores training responses in a vector database,
retrieves semantically similar responses during inference, and employs a GLM to
analyze these responses and determine appropriate scores. We further optimize
the system through fine-tuned retrieval processes and prompt engineering.
Evaluation on the SemEval 2013 dataset demonstrates a significant improvement
on the SCIENTSBANK 3-way and 2-way tasks compared to existing methods,
highlighting the potential of GLMs in advancing ASAS technology.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can generative AI accurately grade students' short answers by comparing them to previously scored responses?
- Setting and data: SemEval 2013 dataset (SCIENTSBANK 3-way and 2-way tasks).
- Method: Tests a new AI scoring system against existing methods on a short-answer dataset.
Why it matters
Automated short answer scoring is a critical component of educational assessment. While traditional systems relied on rule-based algorithms or complex deep learning methods, recent advancements in generative language models offer new opportunities for improvement.
Key findings
- The generative AI system significantly outperformed existing automated methods at grading short answers on the SemEval 2013 student assessment dataset.
- Comparing new responses to similar, previously scored student answers enabled generative language models to determine appropriate grades accurately.
- Refining how past responses are retrieved and carefully phrasing instructions further optimized the AI tool's grading accuracy.
Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
