Date
Publisher
arXiv
Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) have advanced rapidly in recent years and have been successfully applied to e-learning environments like intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs). Despite great success, the broader application of DRL to educational technologies has been limited due to major challenges such as sample inefficiency and difficulty designing the reward function. In contrast, Apprenticeship Learning (AL) uses a few expert demonstrations to infer the expert's underlying reward functions and derive decision-making policies that generalize and replicate optimal behavior. In this work, we leverage a generalized AL framework, THEMES, to induce effective pedagogical policies by capturing the complexities of the expert student learning process, where multiple reward functions may dynamically evolve over time. We evaluate the effectiveness of THEMES against six state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrating its superior performance and highlighting its potential as a powerful alternative for inducing effective pedagogical policies and show that it can achieve high performance, with an AUC of 0.899 and a Jaccard of 0.653, using only 18 trajectories of a previous semester to predict student pedagogical decisions in a later semester.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can an apprenticeship learning framework capture students' changing learning strategies to predict pedagogical decisions across semesters?
- Setting and data: Undergraduate STEM probability course at a public university, four semesters (2021–2024), 221 students total, 89 expert student interaction trajectories.
- Method: Machine learning policy induction using apprenticeship learning with time-aware trajectory partitioning, evaluated via semester-based temporal cross-validation.
Why it matters
Reinforcement learning for educational systems faces sample inefficiency and difficulty designing reward functions. Apprenticeship learning infers rewards from few expert demonstrations, but existing methods fail to capture students' evolving reward functions and learning goals.
Key findings
- THEMES significantly outperformed six competitive baseline models across all evaluation metrics, achieving an average AUC of 0.879 and a Jaccard score of 0.626.
- Using just 18 expert trajectories from one semester, THEMES achieved an AUC of 0.899 and a Jaccard score of 0.653 when predicting student strategies in the next year.
- A case study revealed that while some students maintain stable learning intentions, others transition through multiple clusters, which THEMES successfully captured through dynamic trajectory partitioning.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
