Repository Feedback

Your feedback helps us improve the repository's content relevance and usability. Please share your thoughts to help us better serve researchers and practitioners.

Submit feedback

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Evaluating Vision - Language and Large Language Models for Automated Student Assessment in Indonesian Classrooms

Authors
Nurul Aisyah,
Muhammad Dehan Al Kautsar,
Arif Hidayat,
Raqib Chowdhury,
Fajri Koto
Date
Publisher
arXiv
Although vision-language and large language models (VLM and LLM) offer promising opportunities for AI-driven educational assessment, their effectiveness in real-world classroom settings, particularly in underrepresented educational contexts, remains underexplored. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a state-of-the-art VLM and several LLMs on 646 handwritten exam responses from grade 4 students in six Indonesian schools, covering two subjects: Mathematics and English. These sheets contain more than 14K student answers that span multiple choice, short answer, and essay questions. Assessment tasks include grading these responses and generating personalized feedback. Our findings show that the VLM often struggles to accurately recognize student handwriting, leading to error propagation in downstream LLM grading. Nevertheless, LLM-generated feedback retains some utility, even when derived from imperfect input, although limitations in personalization and contextual relevance persist.
Study at a glance
  • Question: How well can AI models read, grade, and give feedback on handwritten elementary student exams?
  • Setting and data: 646 handwritten math and English exam sheets with over 14,000 answers from grade 4 students across six Indonesian schools.
  • Method: Tests how well AI models read handwriting, grade student responses, and generate personalized feedback.
Why it matters

Vision-language and large language models offer promising opportunities for AI-driven educational assessment. However, their effectiveness in real-world classroom settings, particularly in underrepresented educational contexts, remains underexplored.

Key findings
  • In six Indonesian elementary schools, vision AI often struggled to read fourth-grade handwritten math and English exams, causing errors in downstream automated grading.
  • Automated feedback retained some usefulness for assessment even when generated from imperfectly recognized student handwriting.
  • Language models showed persistent limitations in providing personalized and contextually relevant student feedback.

Summary drafted with AI from the paper’s abstract and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.

What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?