Date
Publisher
arXiv
Large Language Models (LLMs) have tremendous potential to play a key role in
supporting mathematical reasoning, with growing use in education and AI
research. However, most existing benchmarks are limited to English, creating a
significant gap for low-resource languages. For example, Bangla is spoken by
nearly 250 million people who would collectively benefit from LLMs capable of
native fluency. To address this, we present BanglaMATH, a dataset of 1.7k
Bangla math word problems across topics such as Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry,
and Logical Reasoning, sourced from Bangla elementary school workbooks and
annotated with details like grade level and number of reasoning steps. We have
designed BanglaMATH to evaluate the mathematical capabilities of both
commercial and open-source LLMs in Bangla, and we find that Gemini 2.5 Flash
and DeepSeek V3 are the only models to achieve strong performance, with $\ge$
80\% accuracy across three elementary school grades. Furthermore, we assess the
robustness and language bias of these top-performing LLMs by augmenting the
original problems with distracting information, and translating the problems
into English. We show that both LLMs fail to maintain robustness and exhibit
significant performance bias in Bangla. Our study underlines current
limitations of LLMs in handling arithmetic and mathematical reasoning in
low-resource languages, and highlights the need for further research on
multilingual and equitable mathematical understanding. Dataset link:
\href{https://github.com/TabiaTanzin/BanglaMATH-A-Bangla-benchmark-dataset-for-testing-LLM-mathematical-reasoning-at-grades-6-7-and-8.git}{https://github.com/BanglaMATH}
Study at a glance
- Question: Can large language models successfully solve elementary-level math word problems written in Bangla?
- Setting and data: Bangladesh; 1,703 grade 6, 7, and 8 math word problems from authentic school workbooks and exams; evaluated June 2025.
- Method: Benchmark evaluation using zero-shot prompting of commercial and open-source models.
Why it matters
Most mathematical reasoning benchmarks are limited to English, leaving an evaluation gap for low-resource languages like Bangla, which is spoken by nearly 250 million people who could benefit from fluent language models.
Key findings
- Gemini 2.5 Flash and DeepSeek V3 were the only models achieving over 80% accuracy across grades 6 through 8, while GPT-4 scored below 70% in all grades.
- Model accuracy dropped significantly as arithmetic complexity and the number of reasoning steps increased, falling below 50% for all models on problems requiring four or more steps.
- Adding irrelevant distracting information lowered top models' accuracy by roughly 20%, whereas translating questions into English improved their accuracy by at least 6.5%.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
