Date
Publisher
arXiv
Students disengaging from their tasks can have serious long-term
consequences, including academic drop-out. This is particularly relevant for
students in distance education. One way to measure the level of disengagement
in distance education is to observe participation in non-mandatory exercises in
different online courses. In this paper, we detect student disengagement in the
non-mandatory quizzes of 42 courses in four semesters from a distance-based
university. We carefully identified the most informative student log data that
could be extracted and processed from Moodle. Then, eight machine learning
algorithms were trained and compared to obtain the highest possible prediction
accuracy. Using the SHAP method, we developed an explainable machine learning
framework that allows practitioners to better understand the decisions of the
trained algorithm. The experimental results show a balanced accuracy of 91\%,
where about 85\% of disengaged students were correctly detected. On top of the
highly predictive performance and explainable framework, we provide a
discussion on how to design a timely intervention to minimise disengagement
from voluntary tasks in online learning.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can machine learning and explainability methods accurately detect student disengagement from voluntary online quizzes to guide interventions?
- Setting and data: Central European distance university, 42 online courses across four semesters (2017–2019), 565 students and over 30,000 interaction records from Moodle.
- Method: Machine learning model evaluation (benchmarking eight algorithms) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
Why it matters
Students disengaging from non-mandatory online tasks can lead to serious long-term consequences, including academic drop-out. Identifying disengagement factors through learning management system logs enables timely interventions to support student success.
Key findings
- A feed-forward neural network predicted student disengagement from voluntary quizzes with a balanced accuracy of 91% and correctly identified about 85% of disengaged students.
- Higher voluntary quiz submission rates were clearly associated with higher final course grades.
- Model explainability analysis revealed that disengagement risk stems from erratic, delayed, and irregular interaction patterns, primarily driven by inactive days and activity timing.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
