Date
Publisher
arXiv
Various machine learning approaches have gained significant popularity for
the automated classification of educational text to identify indicators of
learning engagement -- i.e. learning engagement classification (LEC). LEC can
offer comprehensive insights into human learning processes, attracting
significant interest from diverse research communities, including Natural
Language Processing (NLP), Learning Analytics, and Educational Data Mining.
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have demonstrated
remarkable performance in various NLP tasks. However, their comprehensive
evaluation and improvement approaches in LEC tasks have not been thoroughly
investigated. In this study, we propose the Annotation Guidelines-based
Knowledge Augmentation (AGKA) approach to improve LLMs. AGKA employs GPT 4.0 to
retrieve label definition knowledge from annotation guidelines, and then
applies the random under-sampler to select a few typical examples.
Subsequently, we conduct a systematic evaluation benchmark of LEC, which
includes six LEC datasets covering behavior classification (question and
urgency level), emotion classification (binary and epistemic emotion), and
cognition classification (opinion and cognitive presence). The study results
demonstrate that AGKA can enhance non-fine-tuned LLMs, particularly GPT 4.0 and
Llama 3 70B. GPT 4.0 with AGKA few-shot outperforms full-shot fine-tuned models
such as BERT and RoBERTa on simple binary classification datasets. However, GPT
4.0 lags in multi-class tasks that require a deep understanding of complex
semantic information. Notably, Llama 3 70B with AGKA is a promising combination
based on open-source LLM, because its performance is on par with closed-source
GPT 4.0 with AGKA. In addition, LLMs struggle to distinguish between labels
with similar names in multi-class classification.
Study at a glance
- Question: Can adding annotation guideline definitions and examples to prompts improve large language models on educational text classification tasks?
- Setting and data: Six English-language online discussion forum datasets covering computer science, management, mathematics, economics, and medicine, totaling tens of thousands of posts.
- Method: Benchmark evaluation comparing non-fine-tuned models using basic prompts versus guideline-augmented prompts against fine-tuned baseline models.
Why it matters
Analyzing online learner texts manually is labor-intensive, while language models with basic prompts lack domain-specific knowledge and make errors. Improving automated text classification helps instructors understand student engagement and provide timely, personalized support.
Key findings
- Augmenting prompts with annotation guidelines increased models' weighted F1 scores on learning engagement classification tasks by up to 8.48 percentage points.
- GPT-4.0 with guideline augmentation outperformed fully fine-tuned BERT and RoBERTa models on three binary classification tasks.
- The open-source Llama 3 70B model with guideline augmentation performed on par with the closed-source GPT-4.0 across all evaluated tasks.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
What is the application?
Who is the user?
Who age?
Why use AI?
Study design
