Date
Publisher
arXiv
This paper examines the integration of emotional intelligence into artificial
intelligence systems, with a focus on affective computing and the growing
capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and Claude, to
recognize and respond to human emotions. Drawing on interdisciplinary research
that combines computer science, psychology, and neuroscience, the study
analyzes foundational neural architectures - CNNs for processing facial
expressions and RNNs for sequential data, such as speech and text - that enable
emotion recognition. It examines the transformation of human emotional
experiences into structured emotional data, addressing the distinction between
explicit emotional data collected with informed consent in research settings
and implicit data gathered passively through everyday digital interactions.
That raises critical concerns about lawful processing, AI transparency, and
individual autonomy over emotional expressions in digital environments. The
paper explores implications across various domains, including healthcare,
education, and customer service, while addressing challenges of cultural
variations in emotional expression and potential biases in emotion recognition
systems across different demographic groups. From a regulatory perspective, the
paper examines emotional data in the context of the GDPR and the EU AI Act
frameworks, highlighting how emotional data may be considered sensitive
personal data that requires robust safeguards, including purpose limitation,
data minimization, and meaningful consent mechanisms.
Study at a glance
- Question: How do emotional AI systems process emotional data, and what regulatory and ethical challenges arise under current privacy frameworks?
- Setting and data: Legal and technical literature review examining EU regulations, global privacy frameworks, and OpenAI's ChatGPT-4.5 case study.
- Method: Conceptual and policy analysis with a case study.
Why it matters
Integrating emotional intelligence into AI systems offers personalized and empathetic responses, but it raises complex challenges regarding privacy, consent, data protection, and human-AI relationships.
Key findings
- Emotional data qualifies as personal data and may constitute special category data under the GDPR, imposing strict requirements on consent, purpose limitation, and data minimization.
- The EU AI Act explicitly mandates transparency for emotion recognition systems and subjects high-risk deployments in education, employment, or law enforcement to strict governance rules.
- OpenAI's ChatGPT-4.5 incorporates improved emotional intelligence to detect sentiment and adjust tone, yet it lacks dedicated user interface disclosures or distinct emotional data consent mechanisms.
Summary drafted with AI from the full paper and may contain errors. See the full paper for details.
Who age?
Why use AI?
