Search and Filter

Submit a research study

Contribute to the repository:

Add a paper

Descriptive – Product Development

Takeaways

  • Integrating human oversight with AI tools through collaborative design processes involving teachers in development and review stages ensures educational tools align with curriculum objectives and pedagogical needs while maintaining appropriate human judgment (Sonkar et al. (2024), Clark et al. (2025), Baffour et al. (2024)).
  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated educational content by grounding responses in verified textbooks, curriculum materials, and reliable sources (Kloker et al. (2024), Forootani et al. (2024), Hu & Wang (2024)).
  • Simulation-based learning environments powered by AI enable students to practice skills in authentic scenarios without real-world consequences, allowing for experimentation, failure, and iterative improvement (Mollick et al. (2024), Ben-Zion et al. (2024), Mollick & Mollick (2024)).
  • AI assessment tools demonstrate the highest accuracy and educational value when they evaluate multiple dimensions of student work (not just correctness), provide specific feedback for improvement, and maintain alignment with learning objectives (Baral et al. (2024), Xie et al. (2024)).
  • Addressing bias in AI educational tools requires diverse representation in training datasets, ongoing evaluation with varied stakeholder input, and systematic review processes to ensure equitable learning experiences for all students (Makridis et al. (2024), Eloundou et al. (2025), Baffour et al. (2024)).

Research synthesis is AI-generated, human reviewed. Updated 03/2025.

Displaying 1 - 30 of 138